Sydney Airport enticed by revised takeover offer

Steve Creedy

By Steve Creedy Mon Sep 13, 2021

A drawn-out takeover bid for Australia’s biggest airport may be reaching a conclusion after the consortium seeking to buy Sydney Airport upped its offer to $A8.75 a share. The airport announced yesterday it would open its books so the alliance of IFM investors, QSuper, AustralianSuper and Global Infrastructure partners could perform due diligence. The indicative, conditional land non-binding offer was the third attempt by the consortium to bid for the airport — the previous offers of $A8.25 and $A8.45 a share were rebuffed — with the latest offer worth almost $A24 billion. READ: SITA wields one COVID platform to rule them all. The airport said in a statement that the intention was to unanimously recommend that the $8.75 per share bid be accepted as in the best interests of shareholders. “The boards note that there is no certainty that the Further Revised Indicative Proposal, or provision of access to the consortium to conduct due diligence, will result in a binding offer for Sydney Airport,’’ the statement said. The airport expects due diligence to take about four weeks. The warmer reception comes after the consortium's previous proposal in August received short shrift. The airport said at the time its boards had carefully considered the proposal but concluded it continued to undervalue the airport and was not in the best interest of security holders. That stance came after a similarly blunt rejection in July of its previous bid of $A8.25 per share. The airport pointed in its August statement to the rapid acceleration in Australian vaccination rates and government plans to progressively ease restrictions. “Sydney Airport remains strongly positioned, has strengthened its balance sheet and tightly managed costs to maintain flexibility to respond to a range of recovery scenarios and to pursue sensible growth opportunities as the recovery unfolds,’’ it said. “At the current indicative price of $A8.45 per stapled security, the Boards continue to view the revised indicative proposal as opportunistic in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.”  

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing
Airline News

Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing

Feb 13, 2026

Nicholas Ling

Featured articles

View more
This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul
Airline News

This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul

Feb 12, 2026

Airline Ratings
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood