New changes to Philippine Airline safety ratings

Sharon Petersen

By Sharon Petersen Mon Apr 14, 2014

Last week the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in America restored the Philippines civil aviation status to a category 1 rating after it was demoted to category 2 six years ago amidst safety concerns.  The FAA first banned all carriers from the Philippines in 2008 from flying into its airspace or adding to pre-existing routes between the Philippines and the United States. National carrier Philippine Airlines continued to fly to the United States under the FAA ban but it has been limited to 28 flights a week to four U.S. destinations and only with certain aircraft.  The lift of the FAA ban means any carrier from the Philippines is now able to fly in American airspace and for carriers like Philippine Airlines it allows it to increase capacity and routes between the two countries.

In an encouraging day for aviation in the Philippines, the European Union (EU) also lifted a ban on Cebu Pacific (the country’s second largest airline) on the same day as the announcement by the FAA.  According to Julian Vassallo of the European Commission "the good news doesn’t end there…The European Commission is likely to mount another assessment mission to the Philippines later in the year to assess Philippine aviation as a whole, including internal aviation, with the prospect of lifting the ban on Philippine aviation as a whole."

Philippine Transportation Secretary Joseph Abaya said in a statement that the FAA upgrade "cements a landmark era in the Philippine aviation sector".

As a result of these changes by both the FAA and the EU, AirlineRatings has also made changes to its safety ratings of airlines based in the Philippines.  Cebu Pacific which previously scored only a 2/7 for safety has increased to a more respectable 4/7 for safety and Philippine Airlines, the country’s largest carrier has gone from a 5/7 to an impressive 6/7.  Philippine Airlines low cost off-shoot PAL Express now rates as a 4/7 and AirAsia Zest a 3/7.


See our safety rating criteria and the importance of FAA and EU endorsement.

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing
Airline News

Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing

Feb 13, 2026

Nicholas Ling

Featured articles

View more
This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul
Airline News

This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul

Feb 12, 2026

Airline Ratings
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
Arik Air B737 diverts after engine failure mid-flight
Airline News

Arik Air B737 diverts after engine failure mid-flight

Feb 12, 2026

Josh Wood