Boeing loses big MAX order to Airbus

Steve Creedy

By Steve Creedy Mon Jul 8, 2019

Boeing has lost a  737 MAX customer to Airbus after Saudi Arabian budget carrier Flyadeal reversed a commitment for up to 50 of the troubled jets. The Saudi airline announced Sunday it had placed a firm order for 30 A320neo aircraft with options for another 20 from the A320neo family as it pursues an all-Airbus fleet. Boeing later said that it understood Flyadeal would not finalize its commitment to the  737 MAX “at this time given the airline’s schedule requirements”. READ: Boeing sets aside $US100m for 737 MAX families. Flyadeal said the allocation of the new aircraft came after an agreement for a total of 100 aircraft which Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation (SAUDIA) signed during the Paris Air Show in June this year. It said the move was part of the dual brand strategy of the Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation where flyadeal serves the price conscious customer that is seeking Everyday Low Fares. The decision is a setback for Boeing as it grapples with lawsuits, multiple investigations and to meet regulatory hurdles to getting the MAX back into service after two fatal crashes. The US manufacturer received a huge boost in Paris when International Airlines Group signaled its intention to buy 200 MAX jets, although this has still to be converted into firm orders. But airlines such as Virgin Australia have also used the opportunity to restructure their orders. The aircraft has been grounded since March and it is still uncertain when it will return to the skies. An unexpected glitch with a microprocessor has further delayed US Federal Aviation Administration approval of a software update designed to address potential problems with the flight control system. There were also reports over the weekend that Europe’s aviation regulator has asked for a number of issues to be addressed, including a concern about the jet’s autopilot that had not previously surfaced. Bloomberg said the issue involved the autopilot failing to disengage in certain circumstances.    

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing
Airline News

Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing

Feb 13, 2026

Nicholas Ling

Featured articles

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul
Airline News

This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul

Feb 12, 2026

Airline Ratings
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood