Cathay and Qantas codeshare bid rejected.

Steve Creedy

By Steve Creedy Tue May 28, 2019

A proposal by Cathay Pacific and Qantas to extend their codeshare arrangement has been rejected by Australian authorities as not in the public benefit. Australia's International Air Services Commission found that the public benefits of the proposal were “substantially outweighed” by the public detriment. The Hong Kong carrier and Qantas wanted to update an August 2018 agreement that allowed Qantas to add its code on 15 one-way routes beyond Hong Kong operated by Cathay or Cathay Dragon and Cathay to add its code on 25 one-way routes on Qantas’s domestic network. The variation added another 19 one-way routes beyond Hong Kong on the Cathay/Cathay Dragon side and 32 one-way Australian domestic routes operated by Qantas. READ: Aussies want EASA design standard review after Virgin ATR upset. The bid had been opposed by Virgin Australia, which flies to Hong Kong from Melbourne and Sydney, and had raised concerns at Australia’s competition watchdog. The IASC conceded the variation would result in some consumer benefits in terms of improved connectivity and a potential increase in route options. “However, the commission also finds that the variation is likely to entrench and expand the market position of Qantas and Cathay Pacific to the detriment of Virgin Australia’s competitive position and the position of potential future entrants on the route,’’ it said. “If this occurs it is likely to weaken competition on the route, leading to an increase in prices and /or a reduction of other benefits to consumers.” Qantas had argued that the easier marketing of complex itineraries on a single airline code would be a key benefit to consumers but the commission found The Australian carrier already had the ability to codeshare on a range of Cathay flights beyond Hong Kong. It said it was already possible for Qantas to offer a single airline code on these aircraft through Hong Kong to Australia. Cathay also had the ability to offer through-journey connectivity to passengers from Australia to various destinations via Hong Kong and vice versa. “The marketing of complex itineraries is not dependent on the approval of this application,’’ it said.      

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?
Airline News

Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?

May 16, 2026

Josh Wood

Featured articles

View more
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood
United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents
Airline News

United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents

May 7, 2026

Josh Wood