Asiana 777 postscript

Geoffrey Thomas

By Geoffrey Thomas Sat Jul 6, 2013

How could the world’s safest plane, flown by one of the finest airlines, crash on a perfect summer’s day?
And how could so many passengers just walk away from such a disaster?
Till yesterday the Boeing 777 boasted an extraordinary record of no fatalities and only two hull losses in 18 years of airline service while in recent years Asiana Airlines has emerged as one of a new breed of airlines winning accolades for seven-star service and operations.
Landing the high tech 777 at San Francisco in fine weather should hold no fears for an experienced airline crew.
Crash investigators will zero in on the plane’s two black boxes, which have been recovered, as well as interviews with the pilots and should quickly establish the cause.
Initial focus will be on the plane’s instrument settings to try and understand why it was high on the approach glide slope.
And if, as has been suggested, the 777 was also unstable on the approach why didn’t the pilots abort?
The crash has similarities to the previous operational loss of a 777 in 2008.
In that incident a British Airways 777 landed short of a runway at London’s Heathrow Airport after its engines rolled back to idle due to a fuel blockage caused by ice.
The 777, also on a flight from Shanghai, came to rest on grass 300m short of the runway.
And all 156 passengers and crew walked away thanks to more rigorous seat construction.
And the same new standards are being credited with saving hundreds of lives in the Asiana 777 crash.
The US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and the European agencies introduced much stricter crash impact standards for seats in 1988 from 9 to 16G.
It was found that many passengers killed in plane crashes died after being struck by seats that had ripped away from their mountings and catapulted through the cabin.
However initially only planes designed after 1988 had to comply with the new regulations but since 2009 all planes built must have the 16G seats.
Interestingly the 16G force was selected because the human body cannot survive a greater force.

 

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing
Airline News

Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing

Feb 13, 2026

Nicholas Ling

Featured articles

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul
Airline News

This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul

Feb 12, 2026

Airline Ratings
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
AirAsia X low cost flights to London are back!
Airline News

AirAsia X low cost flights to London are back!

Feb 12, 2026

Josh Wood