Boeing knew of 737 MAX indicator problem in 2017

Steve Creedy

By Steve Creedy Mon May 6, 2019

Boeing has confirmed that it knew as far back as 2017 that an angle-of-attack warning light supposed to come as standard on the 737 MAX was not working as intended. But the aerospace giant argues the angle-of-attack (AOA) disagree alert was not necessary for the safe operation of the aircraft. Faulty AOA sensors were part of a chain of events that led to the crash of two 737 MAX aircraft within five months and it is not clear that having the alerts would have changed the outcome. The Lion Air crash in October 2018, and another involving Ethiopian Airlines in March together resulted in 346 deaths. The Wall Street Journal reported that Boeing did not share information about the problem with the AOA alert for about a year and then gave some airlines and pilots partial and inconsistent explanations. It claimed senior FAA and airline officials were increasingly raising questions about Boeing’s transparency over the cockpit warnings. Southwest said recently that Boeing documentation indicated the AOA disagree alert was functional in its MAX planes and it did not learn this was not the case until after the Lion Air crash. READ: Boeing didn't tell Southwest about disabled indicator.   The issue has arisen as a number of investigations are underway into the certification of the MAX aircraft and the company's relationship with the FAA. Boeing confirmed at that time that it intended for the AOA disagree alert to be a standard, standalone feature on the MAX but that this had not happened because of software issues. In a further statement issued in the US on Sunday, the manufacturer said its engineers first identified the problem several months after deliveries started in 2017. It said software delivered to Boeing linked the AOA Disagree alert to the AOA indicator, an optional feature on the MAX and the earlier 737 NG. This meant the alert activated only if an airline opted for the AOA indicator. “When the discrepancy between the requirements and the software was identified, Boeing followed its standard process for determining the appropriate resolution of such issues,’’ Boeing said. “That review, which involved multiple company subject matter experts, determined that the absence of the AOA Disagree alert did not adversely impact airplane safety or operation. “Accordingly, the review concluded, the existing functionality was acceptable until the alert and the indicator could be delinked in the next planned display system software update." Boeing said senior company leadership was not involved in the review and first became aware of the issue in the aftermath of the Lion Air accident. It pointed to an operations manual bulletin issued on November 6, 2018 — a week after the Lion Air crash — that described the AOA disagree alert as only available if the AOA indicator option was installed. The company also discussed the status of the AOA disagree alert with the US Federal Aviation Administration in the wake of the Lion Air accident. “At that time, Boeing informed the FAA that Boeing engineers had identified the software issue in 2017 and had determined per Boeing’s standard process that the issue did not adversely impact airplane safety or operation,’’ it said. “In December 2018, Boeing convened a Safety Review Board (SRB) to consider again whether the absence of the AOA Disagree alert from certain 737 MAX flight displays presented a safety issue. “That SRB confirmed Boeing’s prior conclusion that it did not. Boeing shared this conclusion and the supporting SRB analysis with the FAA.” Boeing has consistently maintained that all the data to safely operate the aircraft is on the primary flight displays and says this is the information used by pilots to fly a plane as well as in training and checklists. This includes parameters such as airspeed, attitude, altitude, vertical speed, heading and engine power settings in normal flight or, in the case elevated angle of attack, the pitch limit indicator and stick shaker. It reiterated in its latest statement that neither the angle of attack indicator nor the AOA disagree alert was necessary for the safe operation of the aircraft. “They provide supplemental information only and have never been considered safety features on commercial jet transport airplanes,’’ it said. Nonetheless, Boeing is issuing a display system software update that corrects the AOA indicator light problem and makes the function standard in all MAX aircraft.

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
US aviation safety under scrutiny – what the data really shows
Airline News

US aviation safety under scrutiny – what the data really shows

Apr 2, 2026

Josh Wood
Delta A330 engine fire forces emergency landing
Airline News

Delta A330 engine fire forces emergency landing

Mar 31, 2026

Sharon Petersen
London to New York: how BA, Virgin, JetBlue, United, Delta, and Norse compare
Airline News

London to New York: how BA, Virgin, JetBlue, United, Delta, and Norse compare

Mar 30, 2026

Josh Wood
India opens its latest airport amid growing passenger demand: Noida International Airport
Airline News

India opens its latest airport amid growing passenger demand: Noida International Airport

Mar 30, 2026

Dev Lunawat

Featured articles

View more
World's Best Airline Cabin Awards 2026
Airline News

World's Best Airline Cabin Awards 2026

Mar 18, 2026

Airline Ratings
How did an Air Canada Express CRJ900 collide with a fire truck at La Guardia?
Airline News

How did an Air Canada Express CRJ900 collide with a fire truck at La Guardia?

Mar 23, 2026

Dev Lunawat
US aviation safety under scrutiny – what the data really shows
Airline News

US aviation safety under scrutiny – what the data really shows

Apr 2, 2026

Josh Wood
World's Best Airlines for 2026 by Airline Ratings
Airline News

World's Best Airlines for 2026 by Airline Ratings

Mar 18, 2026

Airline Ratings