US travel industry sees new Trump ban as less onerous

Jerome Greer Chandler

By Jerome Greer Chandler

Published 007 Mar 7, 2017

The long-awaited re-make of U.S. President Donald Trump’s travel ban is not setting off fireworks the way the first version did, at least not among travel industry professionals.

In a prepared statement,  U.S. Travel Association president Roger Dow said the Trump Administration deserved some credit “for the substantially more cautious and deliberate introduction of the revised executive order.”

The  Global Business Travel Association (GBTA) agreed, calling the new executive order an improvement over the January 27 version. 

 That order was a haphazard effort, one that set off public demonstrations at airports across the United States.

GBTA executive director Michael W. McCormick believes the new order offers some clarity for travelers and government officials alike.

 “The exemption for legal permanent residents, dual nationals and current visa holders will help mitigate confusion for the international traveling public,” he said.

Specifically,  the revised order bans nationals from Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen who don’t have valid visas from entering the U.S. for 90 days, effective March 16.

 A fact sheet from the Trump Administration says that 90-day number is intended to review or establish standards aimed at preventing terrorists or criminals to enter this country.

 Iraq is not one of the countries covered by the second order because the war-torn nation will be increasing cooperation with the U.S. when it comes to vetting its citizens applying for travel visas to the United States.

Nor does the new order apply to lawful permanent residents of the United States or those with a document that’s valid the date the ban takes effect (March 16).

Despite the better reviews this time around, U.S. Travel Association chief Dow questioned whether the revised order did enough to mollify prospective travelers from Canada, Europe or elsewhere around the world who may have been put off by the initial travel ban.

The jury on that is still very much out.
 

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Get In Touch

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest articles

View more
Air New Zealand Skycouch Review
Airline Ratings review

Air New Zealand Skycouch Review

Jan 9, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Etihad A321LR Economy Class Review
Airline Ratings review

Etihad A321LR Economy Class Review

Dec 29, 2025

Josh Wood
Evidence STARLUX is setting a new standard in Economy and Premium Economy Travel
Airline Ratings review

Evidence STARLUX is setting a new standard in Economy and Premium Economy Travel

Dec 15, 2025

Josh Wood
Is Starlux Airlines quietly becoming the new benchmark for luxury business class?
Airline Ratings review

Is Starlux Airlines quietly becoming the new benchmark for luxury business class?

Dec 9, 2025

Josh Wood
Does Singapore Airlines Business Class live up to its reputation?
Airline Ratings review

Does Singapore Airlines Business Class live up to its reputation?

Dec 2, 2025

Josh Wood

What's trending

View more
World's safest airline rankings for 2026
Airline News

World's safest airline rankings for 2026

Jan 13, 2026

Airline Ratings
Air New Zealand Skycouch Review
Airline Ratings review

Air New Zealand Skycouch Review

Jan 9, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Cathay celebrates 80 years with a stunning retro livery
Airline News

Cathay celebrates 80 years with a stunning retro livery

Jan 6, 2026

Airline Ratings
Etihad A321LR Economy Class Review
Airline Ratings review

Etihad A321LR Economy Class Review

Dec 29, 2025

Josh Wood
Etihad becomes first Gulf airline to earn top safety rating
Airline News

Etihad becomes first Gulf airline to earn top safety rating

Dec 23, 2025

Airline Ratings