Passengers injured on Qantas flight

Geoffrey Thomas

By Geoffrey Thomas Tue Apr 11, 2017

CLICK HERE FOR LATEST UPDATES  A Qantas Boeing 747-400, operating Flt QF29 from Melbourne to Hong Kong has been involved in what the Australian Transport Safety Bureau calls a serious incident which caused minor injuries to 15 passengers on April 7. According to the ATSB,  the 747 was about to enter a holding pattern at Flight Level 220 (22,000ft) about 110km (60nm) southeast of Hong Kong at a waypoint called BETTY when the aircraft’s stick shaker activated. The stick shaker is a mechanical device that noisily vibrates the pilot’s control column or yoke (the stick) to warn of an imminent aerodynamic stall. (An aerodynamic stall occurs when the angle of attack of the wing causes the air moving over the upper surface can no longer remain attached to the surface and the flow breaks down causing a loss of lift and control.) However, Boeing warns that “a stall must not be confused with the stall warning that alerts the pilot to an approaching stall. Recovery from an approach to stall is not the same as a recovery from an actual stall. An approach to stall is a controlled flight maneuver; a stall is an out-of-control, but recoverable, condition.” The Qantas crew immediately disconnected the aircraft’s autopilot and recovered the aircraft manually,  the ATSB said. “While holding at flight level 220, the flight crew received a stick shaker activation and detected airframe buffeting,'' it said. " The flight crew disconnected the autopilot and manoeuvred the aircraft in response. Fifteen passengers received minor injuries.” The 747 in question has continued to operate flights normally since the incident. Qantas confirmed that passengers on QF29 experienced “unexpected turbulence’’ about an hour before landing. The airline said the incident lasted about two minutes and the captain called for an ambulance to meet the aircraft on arrival. The injuries were minor but one passenger was transferred to hospital for a precautionary medical assessment and later released. “We notified the ATSB of the occurrence, and our own teams are also reviewing the event,’’ the airline said in a statement. “These investigations need to be completed before Qantas can comment further.”

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?
Airline News

Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?

May 16, 2026

Josh Wood

Featured articles

View more
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents
Airline News

United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents

May 7, 2026

Josh Wood
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood