Survey finds 1 in 5 will never be comfortable flying the MAX

2253
May 08, 2019
Boeing
Photo: Boeing

Just 19 percent of travelers surveyed by Barclays investment bank said they would be comfortable boarding a Boeing 737 MAX immediately after the planes return to service.

The bank, which downgraded Boeing shares from equal weight to overweight as a result of the survey, found that 21 percent of 1756 people surveyed in Europe and North America who flew at least once a year did not feel they would ever be comfortable flying on the plane.

Twenty percent said they would wait a few months before flying on the MAX while 23 percent said they would delay a year or more, according to the Chicago Tribune.

The remaining 17 percent of respondents were unsure.

The bank revealed the survey in an investment note that prompted a fall in Boeing shares.

It comes as the manufacturer is grappling with the fallout of two 737 MAX crashes in less than five months. The crashes, in Indonesia and Ethiopia, killed 346 people and led to the grounding of the global 737 MAX fleet.

READ: Boeing boss again defends MAX software design.

Boeing is working with the US Federal Aviation Administration and other regulators around the world on software and training changes it says will prevent a re-occurrence of the crashes.

Regulators need to approve the changes as safe before the controversial aircraft can return to the skies and it is not yet clear when that will happen.

Although the figures show the majority of people would eventually fly on a MAX, they underscore the big task the US manufacturer has ahead of it to restore trust in the aircraft after the crashes and a flurry of media reports about issues at the company.

It was not all completely bad news — the survey found experienced flyers were more amenable to getting backing on a plane than those who flew only occasionally. North Americans were also more trusting than their European counterparts.

The survey found 40 percent of people who flew six or more times a year would be willing to get back on a MAX.

But the bank noted that almost half of respondents would not fly on a MAX for a year or more.

“If given a choice between a MAX and another aircraft type on otherwise identical flights, 52 percent would choose the other aircraft type,’’ it said.

Barclays said it expected the recovery of 737 MAX production to take longer than expected and predicted airlines would be unlikely to take the plane as quickly as they were before the crashes.

Boeing chief executive Dennis Muilenburg has acknowledged that the company has to re-earn passenger trust and prove that the plane is safe.

 

2 COMMENTS

  1. Bottom line, it is a 'physical' design flaw with the 737MAX. If you're gonna try to put huge new turbofans on the 737, you need to 'raise' the aircraft so they can be place in their 'normal' position under the wing. Yes, you need to give MAX 'longer legs' - the landing gear struts need to be lengthened to give it greater ground clearance. You can only flatten the bottom of the engine housings much. The root cause of MAX's troubles it where they have positioned the larger engines - too far forward and to far 'up'. I simply WON'T fly 737MAX aircraft - which is quite easy to do. The majority of airlines in S.E. Asia use A320, a few use 737-800/900 ( QANTAS & Virgin, Lion / Malindo / Batik, MH, GA ). Garuda have cancelled MAX Order, Virgin have delayed delivery until it is 'out of the news' / forgotten about. Easy to 'not fly' on a 737MAX .....
  2. With lack of confidence in Boeing's honesty with the whole concept of the X l do not believe the aircraft is sound. A standard aircraft with bigger therefore heavier engines lifted and further forward sounds like a change of centre of gravity. An aircraft needs to be aerodynamicaly sound not tweaked.