Mystery deepens on Lion Air crash after Boeing bulletin

Geoffrey Thomas

By Geoffrey Thomas Wed Nov 7, 2018

The Boeing alert to 737 MAX operators to follow the manual when erroneous data problems are encountered from flight sensors raises more questions than it answers in relation to the Lion Air crash on Monday, October 29. READ: Boeing issues an operational update for 737. The problem is centered around the 737 MAX’s Angle of Attack sensor which may “tell” the pilots and the plane’s computers that it’s about to stall (aerodynamic) and put the 737 into a dive. If this happens (un-commanded nose-down stabilizer trim) pilots can respond by pushing a switch on their control column (yoke), however, 737’s computers will resume trying to dive as soon as the switch is released the new Boeing bulletin said. Essentially the Boeing bulletin tells the pilots to follow the manual’s instructions. And in this case the procedure for dealing with the problem it is what is called a “memory item” – pilot’s commit them to memory. But what is disturbing is why Lion Air didn’t pull this plane from service after repeated problems. It is one thing for an engineer to fix a problem once but if the problem persists as it did with this aircraft then there is something far deeper that needs greater attention suggest safety analysts. Soerjanto Tjahjono, chairman of the National Transport Safety Committee, told media that that airspeed indicator malfunctions on the jet's last four flights, and that this issue was intertwined with the AOA sensor issue. "The point is that after the AOA is replaced the problem is not solved but the problem might even increase. NTSC wants to explore this," he said. It turns out that the AOA sensor was replaced the day before the 737 crashed and possibly worsened the other airspeed indicator problems investigators suggest. However, this new reminder from Boeing raises questions about the pilots’ actions, how the flight crews are trained and if the maintenance that was performed was adequate. What is puzzling analysts is the 737 was flying in clear skies in daylight, so the pilots should have been easily able to deal with the issues with airspeed and erroneous sensors. If aircraft upsets occur at night or in cloud with no horizon reference confusion levels have increased despite the fact that the aircraft cockpit is fitted with an artificial horizon instrument. But one Australian 737 captain told Airlineratings.com “if the pilots didn’t take the right actions because they were startled you can be in trouble.” “But it is quite straightforward and we train for this all the time,” the captain said. “These procedures are all memory items, it’s “101’ of flying.

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?
Airline News

Why are pre-takeoff and landing checks so important?

May 16, 2026

Josh Wood

Featured articles

View more
Flying to Nepal? You need to read this
Airline News

Flying to Nepal? You need to read this

May 19, 2026

Sharon Petersen
Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?
Airline News

Jetstar vs Scoot between Singapore and Australia: Who's the better choice?

May 21, 2026

Nicholas Ling
Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?
Airline News

Which airline is best between the UK and Dubai?

May 20, 2026

Josh Wood
United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents
Airline News

United Airlines 767 accident adds to pattern of recent incidents

May 7, 2026

Josh Wood