QZ8501: Caught in a severe thunderstorm

Geoffrey Thomas

By Geoffrey Thomas Tue Jan 20, 2015

Indonesia AirAsia flight QZ8501 climbed at least five times its capability before it stalled and plummeted into the Java Sea killing all 162 aboard.

Yesterday, Indonesia’s Transport Minister Ignasius Jonan citing radar tapes, told media that, "the A320 suddenly went up at a speed (6000ft/minute) above the normal limit that it was able to climb to. Then it stalled."

According to an A320 check captain the plane, at that altitude, “is only capable of climbing at 1000ft a minute." 

“The crew could only have been caught in a massive updraft associated with a severe thunderstorm.”

“the question is how on earth did they find themselves in the middle of a severe thunderstorm,” said the check captain.

Suggested Read: The danger of flying in thunderstorms

The check captain suggests that the crew may have misread their weather radar or the radar itself may have been faulty.

On December 30 AirlineRatings.com broke the story of the A320s wild ride revealing the plane was climbing through 36,300ft but its forward speed had decayed by 200km/hr to the point where it couldn’t sustain flight.

Air traffic controllers lost contact with the plane just four minutes after its crew requested a deviation of their flight route to avoid storms.
Flight QZ8501 was flying between Surabaya and Singapore with 162 passengers and crew on Sunday December 28 when it disappeared off radar 42 minutes into the flight.

The minister’s comments came after Indonesian investigators said they were focusing on the possibility of human error – or problems with the plane’s systems - causing the crash, following an initial analysis of the cockpit voice recorder.

"We didn’t hear any other person, no explosion," investigator Nurcahyo Utomo told media.

As well as the cockpit voice recorder, crash investigators are also examining information from in the flight data recorder. A preliminary report will be released on January 28

Read more: Freak storms set to rise

Have questions or want to share your thoughts?

Comments

No comments yet, be the first to write one.

Latest news and reviews

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation
Airline News

LATAM 777’s high-stakes rejected takeoff in São Paulo prompts an investigation

Feb 18, 2026

Josh Wood
Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing
Airline News

Why Emirates built its airline around two aircraft - and why that’s changing

Feb 13, 2026

Nicholas Ling

Featured articles

View more
NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport
Airline News

NTSB Final Report: causes of the midair collision at Reagan National Airport

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul
Airline News

This review proves that low cost carriers aren't always cheaper: AirAsia X vs Malaysia Airlines long haul

Feb 12, 2026

Airline Ratings
This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why
Airline News

This Canadian airline flies 49-year-old aircraft: we tell you why

Feb 19, 2026

Josh Wood
 TransNusa Perth to Bali review
Airline News

TransNusa Perth to Bali review

Feb 4, 2026

Chris Parry