Saturday, May 4, 2024
Book Flights
 

American plans to expand use of advanced cabin baggage scanners

American Airlines is already planning to expand the use of advanced security screening equipment as part of a $US6 million deal to buy computed tomography (CT)  equipment that shows a 3-D image of cabin bags and more clearly identifies threats.

The airline said a deal with US company Analogic to buy eight units was part of a partnership aimed at greatly expanding the use of CT technology at airport worldwide.

Analogic’s ConnectCT system is currently undergoing certification testing with the TSA that will see it installed in checkpoint lanes as part of the TSA Innovation Task Force initiative. It has also started the certification process in Europe.

American on June 15 began demonstrating he technology in in a checkpoint lane of Terminal 4 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and is set to introduce it in Boston.

This was the first time CT Technology, already used for checked bag screening, had been deployed to screen carry-on bags. Its use speeds up the screening process because passengers do not have to take out laptops or  liquid gels and aerosols.

The US Department of Homeland Security has identified CT technology as one way airports, includingthose in countries outside the US, could raise the bar for global aviation security.

This has ramifications for the ban imposed earlier this year on carrying large electronic devices in the cabins of aircraft operating direct flights from 10 countries in the Middle East and North Africa.

It also comes as the DHS, which is worried terrorists could conceal explosives in devices such as laptops,  is considering expanding that ban to Europe and other parts of the world.

American said potential threats the equipment would allow security officials to more clearly identify included those concealed in electronic devices.

“At American, we are always looking at ways to invest in technology that enhances global aviation security while improving the customer experience,”  American Airlines senior vice president – customer experience Kerry Philipovitch said in a statement. “We believe strongly in risk-based, intelligence-driven security protocols, which enable the aviation industry to identify, manage and mitigate risk.

“Our partnerships with the TSA and Analogic will transform aviation security by bringing state-of-the-art CT technology to the security checkpoint.”

Boeing’s exciting crystal ball

“We studying everything all the time!”

That is the way Mike Sinnett, VP Product Development at Boeing , summed up the aerospace giant’s relentless bid to stay ahead of the competition at this year’s Paris Air Show as it wrapped up last weekend.

SEE: Stunning video of Paris Air Show

And that competition is coming in many forms:  from new airliners from the Canadians, Russians, Chinese, Brazilians with airliners to cutting-edge start-up aerospace companies such as Blake Scholl’s Boom and its promise to fly passengers at Mach 2.2 over the Atlantic again from 2023.

Mr Sinnett said Boeing is working on “low [sonic] boom technology, and examining how supersonics would work in a commercial field. “It will be a very difficult case to close, but very important to work on,” he added.

And the size? “Anything from a business jet to small passenger planes, seating under 70.”

However, Mr Sinnett warned “you burn a lot of fuel to go fast” and Boeing is well away from closing any business case. The technology just isn’t there, he argues, adn while he does expect a supersonic plane within 20 years, it will maybe not Boeing.

However, he declined to address start-up Boom Aerospace’s plans.

On “more conventional” aircraft,  Mr Sinnett said Boeing is working on a host of designs from the flying wing to an aircraft only a mother could love.

One of the more exciting prospects – the flying wing or Blended Wing Body (BWB) – has in fact been around for years. For some time Boeing shied away from the BWB because of airport infrastructure, and the gate width of the BWB’s wingspan. But Mr Sinnett told media that “if a high span is so much more fuel efficient, infrastructure will change.”

He said that the ideal BWB would seat 300 seats and it has solved all the issues surrounding passenger acceptance of the unconventional nature of the aircraft.

The BWB is, in fact, a lifting body and passengers sit in the wing box which would resemble a small picture theater.

As mentioned the Flying Wing is not new and dates back to the 1940s. Below is a video touting the virtues of the Northrop concept of the late 1940s.

Boeing is also looking at an autonomous aircraft that could be a small hybrid-electric freighter.

“It’s an important step to help us flesh out that technology,” said Mr Sinnett.

He suggests that the technology for autonomous flight is a much bigger challenge than public acceptance. “We need to figure out what the possibilities are, and we need to do it in a responsible way,” he said. “When you think about the outcomes, one outcome may be that we can’t do it.

Mr Sinnett said that Boeing’s first autonomous aircraft would most probably be a small freighter. “It would be so ugly that no pilot would want to fly it anyway.”

However seriously Mr Sinnett suggested that Boeing’s push to autonomous aircraft may just lead to “fewer pilots on long-haul flights” which typically carry four.

The big question is, said Mr Sinnett with all the forecast growth in air traffic “how do we ensure that all the aircraft forecasted are crewed in the future?”

“When I look at the future, I see a need for 41,000 commercial jet airplanes over the course of the next 20 years. And that means we are going to need something like 617,000 more pilots – that’s a lot of pilots,” said Mr Sinnett.

He noted that autopilots had been around for almost as long as powered flight but getting a computer to fly an aircraft from gate to gate and handle unexpected and contingencies is another thing entirely.

He is skeptical that a computer could be programmed for such a mission and machine learning (AI) is the only solution. But the warning is “for a machine to make decisions, you can’t have a case where the decision maker will always make the same decisions.”

“Humans don’t operate that way,” said Mr Sinnett. “We have to be able to know that the decisions the plane would make are both bounded and acceptable. We’re working very specifically to understand where the pilot steps into a safety situation.”

However, Boeing is looking at every aspect and exploring autonomy for civil aircraft with trials of autonomous ground taxiing, machine learning, and High Integrity Systems.

Mr Sinnett added that “the basic building blocks of the technology clearly are available.”

Boeing will test the artificial intelligence technology in a cockpit simulator this summer and then fly it on “an airplane next year.”

While Boeing may find a pilotless aircraft may be impossible,  “useful lessons will be learned along the way, perhaps for autonomous freighter aircraft, or reduced crew for long-haul flights.”

Asked what the timeline might be, Mr Sinnett joked: “I know two things, it’s not before 2040, and that I am wrong.”

To prove up many aspects of this and other technologies Boeing will fly a 777 as the next EcoDemonstrator in Spring 2018.

It will test propulsion advancements, advanced materials, efficient flight operations, and lower fuel burn. Another EcoDemonstrator – a 787 –  will follow in 2019 and it will test interior concepts and capabilities with a focus on Boeing’s NMA or 797.

Southwest pilots feeling blue about the new black.

When Southwest Airlines recently rolled out its new uniforms its pilots were not amused. The shoulder epaulets “made us look like Captain Crunch,” says Jon Weaks, president of SWAPA—the Southwest Airlines Pilots Union.  Captain Crunch is a U.S. cartoon character on the front of boxes of sweetened breakfast cereal.

The pilot uniforms were just part of the new garb for the company’s 42,000 uniformed employees. Beginning back in 2014, Southwest put together a 43-member Employee Design Team to help the airline choose work clothes. Pilots weren’t part of the selection team.

“Our pilots have a separate uniform program and vendor,” says Southwest spokeswoman Melissa Ford. “Unfortunately many of the new epaulets were sized incorrectly.”

The airline is working with the vendor to correct the issue.

All well and good? Not quite. The pilots are “very dissatisfied” with their new uniforms, says Weaks.

“Our CBA (collective bargaining agreement) with the airline says we should be consulted on uniform changes,” says Weaks. “That was never done.”

The pilot’s union chief says the flight operations department was never involved in the uniform selection process until they were told: “‘This is what [the uniforms] are going to be.’…There was no need at all for the pilots to change uniforms. None at all.”

If epaulets are the target of the pilots’ ire, so too is their uniform’s new color.

“If you’ll look at the way Southwest has tried to change re-brand their logos and everything else about themselves it’s white letters on blue,” says the union president. “We wear navy blue uniforms. Now they’re making us go to black. Our airplanes aren’t black. Our seats aren’t black. They’re blue. Our logo isn’t black. It’s blue. This was a huge mistake on the company’s part.”

And this is not the only mistake of late,  maintains Weaks.

The airline’s rollout in recent years of slimmer, less weighty ‘Evolve’ seating met with considerable criticism. Southwest bought new seats to replace them, seats that are more comfortable. Southwest’s much-promoted Internet link experienced problems—not when it comes to watching TV but in connecting to the Internet per se. The problem has been fixed.

If there’s a common thread weaving uniform, seat and Internet issues together it’s collaboration.

Former Southwest CEO and now chairman emeritus chief Herb Kelleher personified the trait. He no longer runs the Dallas-based airline.

 Jon Weaks says the Internet, seat and uniform decisions “were made by trying to do things cheaper.”

The service-intensive, passenger-first thread holding Southwest together is under pressure but it’s not unraveling.

Tangible evidence that the Southwest spirit is still woven into the fabric of this carrier was there for all to see on a recent packed- to-the-gills flight from Birmingham to Dallas.

A Southwest captain “deadheading” (sitting in the passenger cabin) unhesitatingly helped flight attendants pass out snacks. He had a smile on his face.

Nobody seemed to notice the color of his uniform.

UPDATED: AirAsia X plane ‘shaking like a washing machine’ after engine trouble

Passengers recounted how an AirAsia X Airbus A330-300  began “shaking like a washing machine’’ after experiencing a serious engine problem on its way to Kuala Lumpur from the West Australian capital of Perth on Sunday.

The Kuala Lumpur-based plane with 359 passengers on board was more than an hour into its trip when the problem struck, prompting the Captain to declare an emergency and return to Perth.

Passengers said they were told to adopt the brace position as the plane landed safely about 10 am, some three hours after departure.

AirAsia X described the problem only as a “technical issue’’  but aviation sources confirmed there was an inflight engine shutdown while the plane was in cruise at 38,000ft. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has launched an investigation and said a  report would be issued within a few months.

Sources said a large fan blade failed in the left engine, destroying several components. An engine expert said it was possible the airflow forced the out-of-balance fan to keep turning after the engine was shut down and created a low-frequency vibration that would have continued to shake the plane.

Respected aviation website The Aviation Herald said one of the aircraft’s Rolls-Royce Trent engines suffered a blade fracture and ingested the blade,  resulting in severe damage in the engine core and severe vibrations.

“The crew shut the engine down, drifted the aircraft down to FL200 (20,000ft)  and returned to Perth for a safe landing about two hours after the engine failure,” it said.

A China Eastern A330 aircraft that suffered engine damage and was forced to turn back to Sydney while en-route to Shanghai earlier this month was also Rolls-Royce powered as was an Egyptair A330 that experienced an engine failure in May, although these incidents may not be related to the AirAsia X problem.

Read; Probe starts into gaping hole in China Eastern engine nacelle.

Passengers said they were told the engine had seized after the plane began to shudder a strong smell entered the cabin. Several said there was a bang.

“It was essentially the engine seized up I think, that’s what they told us anyway,” passenger Brenton Atkinson told the ABC.

“It was literally like you were sitting on top of a washing machine. The whole thing was going. We could see the engine out the window which was really shaken on the wing.”

Another passenger said one announcement expressed the hope they would say a prayer and that he was praying for a safe return to Perth.

Questions have been raised about why the crew opted to return to Perth rather than land at an RAAF air base at Learmonth that was closer. The usual practice for an engine failure is to divert to the nearest available suitable airport.

The airline said the flight crew were in constant communication with air traffic control and determined Perth was the most suitable airport “ after assessing all possible options and requirements”.

“The management applaud the decision made by the flight crew that brought the aircraft to land safely at Perth Airport,’’ it said.

Guests were transferred to the next available flight or a recovery flight which departed Perth about 11:40pm Sunday, more than three hours after the original schedule.

The plane is being assessed but passengers reported they were told a blade had sheared off in the left engine.

AirAsia X was put under heightened surveillance by Australia’s air safety regulator after an Airbus A330 leaving Sydney in 2015  was forced to divert to Melbourne when its crew seriously affected key systems trying to fix a data entry error.

In that instance, the captain inadvertently put the wrong longitude in the flight navigation system and told the plane it was 11,000kms from where it actually was.  The error made the plane turn the wrong way after it took off and cross the departure path of an adjacent runway.

 

Boom times in the race for a new supersonic airliner

The airport of Le Bourget in Paris is something like holy ground for supersonic air travel.

In 1969, during the aerospace fair then called Aerosalon, Concorde was presented on a world stage for the first time, shortly after its first flight.

In 1973, the supersonic race between West and East culminated in tragedy when the Soviet Union’s supersonic airliner, the Tupolev Tu-144, crashed after a demonstration flight from Le Bourget near the suburb of Goussainville, killing all six on board and eight on the ground.

Decades later, in 2003, an Air France Concorde landed during the air show one last time.

Today, it is exhibited alongside a prototype in the Concorde hangar at the Air and Space Museum at Le Bourget airport and this past week was the venue for an aerospace career exhibit with a flying car project displayed rather fittingly underneath its delta wings.

And then there was the appearance of a young man from Denver, Colorado, in a cramped conference room in the basement below the exhibition halls.

It was here that Blake Scholl declared: “There is a supersonic revival, the speed of travel changes the way we live”.

Scholl is the founder and chief executive of start-up Boom and he promises to expedite passengers at Mach 2.2 over the Atlantic again — and probably across the Pacific —from 2023.

Although there has been much discussion among scientists and the aerospace community about a successor to Concorde since it stopped flying in 2023, nothing concrete had emerged. The challenges to mitigate the sonic boom, make the engine noise bearable and get the economics to add up seemed insurmountable.

But then Scholl, 36, formerly working for Amazon and a pilot himself, gets on stage to announce: “We now have reservations for 76 aircraft by five major world airlines, they are not just letters of intent, but backed by tens of millions of dollars in non-refundable down payments.”

Scholl says the launch partner is Virgin Atlantic, something that is no surprise given Sir Richard Branson’s longstanding interest in supersonic travel.

Branson provides synergies for Boom to utilize some facilities and expertise from  Virgin Galactic and Virgin Atlantic. He has also signed up for the first ten aircraft of the Boom Passenger Airliner, as it is currently called.

With a length of 51.8m (170ft) and a wingspan of 18.2m, the new aircraft is significantly smaller than Concorde (length 62m, span 25.5m). It will seat 55 passengers in a standard business class cabin in a 1+1 seat layout per row versus  2+2 in Concorde. Alternatively, it can seat 45 in a mixed cabin with 15 seats with a 75-inch seat pitch in a first class section.

The catalogue price for the aircraft is $US200m with entry into service planned for 2023.

But even Scholl admits that is not an easy project, adding that “scepticism is totally OK”.

And while acknowledging Concorde, Scholl is keen to distance Boom from it.

““We will be dramatically more mainstream than Concorde,’’ he says. “Being a smaller aircraft it will be more viable. We are starting at business class fares for transatlantic returns from $US5,000, and prices will go down as more aircraft get deployed.”

Nor is this some far-fetched project but one that is concrete with $US41m in acquired funding.

The end of 2018 will see the first flight of the smaller two-seater XB-1 demonstrator aircraft, dubbed “Baby Boom”, which will be the world’s fastest civil aircraft at Mach 2.2 or 2,235 km/h.

“We now have everything required to build the first independently developed supersonic aircraft – the funding, technical design and manufacturing partners,” Scholl assures AirlineRatings.

Even though Boom assumes that the ban on supersonic flights over land will remain in place for the foreseeable future and the aircraft will be able to fly faster than sound over water only, he sees 500 viable oceanic routes for supersonic travel.

This will see the trip from London to New York take 3:15 hours (instead of seven), the flight from San Francisco to Tokyo completed in 5:24 hours (versus 11 hours subsonic) and Los Angeles – Sydney flown in 6:45 hours instead of 15.

The long transpacific routes will include a refuelling stop, as the unrefuelled range of the aircraft is 4,500nm (8,334 km), just short of the 5,100nm from California to Japan.

Advancements in materials and testing will make the new supersonic aircraft much easier and quicker to develop than Concorde.

“Carbon fibre is a huge enabler for supersonic aircraft,’’ explains Scholl, “It means we can have much bigger windows and despite the friction heat at supersonic speeds the aircraft only grows about 2.5cm in flight, not 30cm as Concorde, made of aluminium (did).

“We employ the same technology as subsonic aircraft, with the engines being the same kind of established turbojets used in cruise missiles.’’

While the Boom airliner will be 10 per cent faster than Concorde, it will carry passengers at fares 75 per cent lower and be 30 per cent quieter.

Asked if “Boom” is really a good name for a project having to deal with a sonic boom and noise, Blake insists: “I love the name, ‘boom and you are there’. And the sonic boom issue is really overblown.”

Surprisingly, even Boeing’s VP product development, Mike Sinnett, referred to the Seattle manufacturer’s research on the next SST (supersonic transport) during a presentation about future projects in Le Bourget.

“We are working on an SST with lower boom technology, it’s exciting work but still very challenging, as it is difficult environmentally and as a business case,” acknowledged Sinnett.

The Boeing executive said his company was reviewing designs “from business jet size to passenger jets of some 70 seats”

“We will see it sooner than in 20 years’ time, but it might not be us doing it in this time period,’’ he said.

One thing Boom and Boeing have in common is that they both clearly have signalled  “a revival of interest in an SST.”

Watch this space.

 

Aviation expert: AirAsiaX A330 engine could have been lost

The AirAsia X aircraft that suffered an engine failure on Sunday could have lost the entire engine and ripped out fuel lines, a former Airbus A330 check and training captain has warned.

The warning by the 40-year flying veteran came as the Australian Transport Safety Bureau yesterday classified the failure as a serious incident and AirAsia X defended its safety reputation.

AirAsia X plane shaking like a washing machine 

“When an engine has severe vibrations it must be shut down immediately as the damage that can be inflicted is immense,” the former training captain said.

“The engine can detach from the wing, which could be catastrophic.”

“Fuel lines (could be) ripped open and electrics severely damaged or degraded.”

“It must be treated like an engine fire.”

“And if after shutdown it is free-wheeling with a missing blade and the severe vibrations continue you must divert to the nearest suitable airport,” the veteran pilot said.

AirAsia X has released few details of the incident which AirlineRatings.com understands involves the failure of a fan blade in the number one engine.
Hydraulic components and an oil pump were also severely damaged by the vibration.

The ATSB is liaising with engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce about the failure and said it expected to produce a report in “a couple of months” after interviewing personnel and gathering additional information.

“During the cruise, the flight crew detected moderate airframe vibrations and the number one engine failed,’ it said in a brief summary. “The aircraft was unable to maintain altitude and the crew conducted a return to Perth.”

Why the aircraft continued shaking and why the aircraft did not divert to nearby Learmonth when the incident occurred near Carnarvon at 8.16 am on Sunday will be matters which will be investigated following the incident .

An engine expert said it was possible an out-of-balance fan could windmill after the engine was shut down and still cause a low-frequency vibration.

He said it was “a pretty massive failure” and would only happen for two reasons: a  manufacturing flaw or a lack of quality inspection during maintenance.

AirAsia X did not answer questions but issued a statement defending its safety record and saying it is cooperating with Rolls-Royce as well as local safety authorities.  It also pointed out Malaysia-based AirAsia X had undergone Global safety audits run by the International Air Transport Association in 2015 and 2016.

“We would like to stress that AirAsia Group has always strictly followed the maintenance program prescribed by our manufacturers,’’ it said.

“We have also complied with all regulations and requirements as set forth by every country where the airline operates, including Australia

“In Australia, AirAsia Group has regularly passed safety and security audits conducted by the local aviation authorities.”

A source said the pilots were first alerted to the problem by an aircraft monitoring system and then heard and felt the vibration from the stricken engine.  They opened the appropriate checklist to shut the engine down, did an 180-degree turn and returned to Perth.

Australia’s crash watchdog will investigate why the pilots of the A330 did not divert to Learmonth,  just 25 minutes away,  rather than fly the 90 minutes back to Perth.

The pilots were offered Learmonth but it was declined. It is understood they considered Geraldton, which is not rated for the A330, but decided the runway was too short.
The loss of one engine on a twin-engine aircraft requires the crew to divert to the nearest suitable airport but the term “suitable” leaves room for pilot discretion on safety grounds.

Stricter passenger rights rules will boost fares: Jetstar

Jetstar

Jetstar Group chief executive Jayne Hrdlicka has warned that any move to introduce European-style passenger rights rules in Australia could drive up fares and affect the nation’s ability to capitalise on burgeoning tourism from Asia.

Passenger rights became a hot topic in the US after the mistreatment of 69-year-old David Dao by United Airlines and Australian consumer group Choice has been campaigning for tougher rules in Australia.

Jetstar and Choice traded blows earlier this year over a customer satisfaction survey of international airlines conducted by 10 consumer advocacy groups ranked it last. The Qantas offshoot claimed the survey, which did not include Jetstar rival Tigerair Australia, was flawed.

Hrdlicka renewed the attack at an American Chamber of Commerce in Australia lunch in Melbourne.

While she said it was clear some airlines in other markets had let their customers down in a big way, she lamented the way the way Australian interest groups had used the incidents to call for more regulations on airlines in Australia, including compensation for flight delays and cancellations.

“Our crew and staff find it frustrating when they see interest groups like Choice using data selectively to attack the airline,’’ she said. “Australia is actually a good example of a market where we have the right balance between strong airlines, high service levels, low fares, consumer rights, and tough but realistic regulations.’’

Hrdlicka said Jetstar wasn’t perfect but “when we get it wrong we say so and take steps to fix it’’.

She highlighted Jetstar’s economic contribution to the economy and an increased access to travel that saw 37 million people fly on Jetstar in the 2016-17 financial year, with 24 million paying less than $100 a flight.

“And we know that the $5 billion dollars in revenue we generate stimulates $50billion in spending across the destinations we travel to,’’ she said.

“We all need to work hard to protect that. Europe has shown that onerous regulatory controls can drive up fares and reduce the ability for airlines, particularly low fares airlines, to continue to deliver such enormous benefits in Australia and many other countries.”

Jetstar has a branded network of airlines in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan and Vietnam with a fleet of 131 aircraft.  Hrdlicka believes it is well placed to take advantage of growth which will see the number of passengers in Asia rise to 2.8 billion by 2034 with China overtaking the US as the biggest passenger market by 2029.

But she warned Australia needed quality and affordable tourism infrastructure such as hotels and attractions if it wanted to avoid falling behind as attempted to capitalise on the next wave of tourism.

She said a second airport in Sydney was a “a real positive” but warned there should not be “gold plated” overdevelopment because it would likely cater for low-cost airlines in its first 10 years.

Additional taxes and rising airport fees and charges were also a risk, she said.

“Our challenge now is to be thinking forward and building the next generation of low fares customer experiences. We are excited about the opportunity this brings for our customers, our people and our shareholders,’’ she said

“I really do believe we’re on the brink of a golden period for tourism in this country. It is ours to make — and we will have to work hard for it. ‘’

 

 

Automatically ejecting black boxes slated for Airbus planes

Singapore brisbane A350
Photo: Steve Creedy

EUROPEAN plane-maker Airbus will offer a “black box” flight recorder designed to automatically eject from an aircraft deforming significantly under stress or immersed in water.

The new automatic deployable flight recorder (ADFR) is designed for longer-range aircraft and will be installed at the rear of the fuselage. It will be manufactured by DRS Technologies Canada, a unit of DRS Leonardo, and is expected to be available in 2019, initially on A350 aircraft.

It will be designed to float and comes with a crash-protected memory module capable of storing up to 25 hours of voice and data recordings as well as emergency locator transmitter to help rescue teams find it more rapidly.

It was one of two new flight recording systems unveiled by the plane-maker at this year’s Paris Air Show in a program developed in collaboration with L3 technologies.

The other was a fixed cockpit voice and data recorder (CVDR) capable of meeting new requirements to extend the duration of voice recording from the current two hours to 25 hours.

Airbus plans to install two of these recorders on single-aisle A320s to increase the redundancy for both flight and data recordings. Aircraft today often have flight one data recorder and one voice recorder.

The manufacturer said the deployable ADFR would be installed in the rear of the fuselage, while a fixed CVDR will be installed near the front of the aircraft. It said this would greatly increase the redundancy for both voice and flight data recovery compared with today’s systems.

Airbus Commercial Aircraft executive vice-president Charles Champion said Airbus and its partners were leading the commercial aircraft industry in implementing the new flight recorders.

“Starting with the very long-range A350 XWB, we look forward to progressively installing these new voice and data recovery devices across our entire product range,’’ he said.

The International Civil Aviation Organisation announced new provisions for flight recorders in 2016 in response to the mysterious disappearance two years earlier of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 in the southern Indian Ocean.

As well as the 25-hour extended cockpit voice recordings, the amendments to Annex 6 of the Chicago Convention require commercial aircraft to carry distress tracking devices which can autonomously transmit location information at least once every minute in distress circumstances.

They also require aircraft to be equipped with a means to have flight recorder data recovered and made available in a timely manner.

CEO questions Qatar move to invest in American

American miami boost
Photo: American Airlines

American Airlines has responded bluntly to news that Qatar Airways plans to become a significant investor and has vowed to continue its long-running feud over government subsidies.

In a surprise move,  Qatar has indicated it wants to take a stake of up to 10 per cent in the US carrier with an investment of up to 4.75 per cent.

“Qatar Airways sees a strong investment opportunity in American Airlines,’’ the Gulf carrier said in an emailed statement.

 “Qatar Airways believes in American Airlines’ fundamentals and intends to build a passive position in the company with no involvement in management, operations or governance.

 “Qatar Airways has long considered American Airlines to be a good oneworld Alliance partner and looks forward to continuing this relationship.’’

The Gulf carrier said it would not exceed an investment of 4.75 per cent without prior consent of the American Airlines board and would it would l make all necessary regulatory filings “at the appropriate time'".

In a letter to staff, American chief executive Doug Parker described the Qatar plan as puzzling at best and concerning at worst.

"While anyone can purchase our shares in the open market, we aren't particularly excited about Qatar's outreach, and we find it puzzling given our extremely public stance on the illegal subsidies that Qatar, Emirates and Etihad have all received over the years from their governments," Parker said.

US commentators suggested the move by Qatar is an attempt to muddy the waters in the battle by the US carriers against their Gulf counterparts.

But Parker said American would not be “discouraged or dissuaded from our full-court press in Washington, D.C., to stand up to companies that are illegally subsidized by their governments.’’

The claim of illegal subsidies has been the centrepiece of a long-running campaign by the big three American carriers against moves by Qatar, Emirates and Etihad to increase their presence in the US market.

The Gulf carriers have denied the claim and accused the Americans of being afraid of competition.

Qatar was one of the airlines affected by a US ban on large electronic devices in aircraft cabins and the small Gulf state currently faces economic sanctions by neighbouring Arab states amid allegations of links to terrorist groups.

 

 

Qantas harnesses science to improve inflight health, design lunch.

qantas

QANTAS is looking for frequent flyers willing to allow wearable technology to monitor their biorhythms as part of a pioneering study into airline passenger health that is already being used to design a new in-flight menu.

The Flying Kangaroo has teamed up with the University of Sydney’s Charles Perkins Centre and a multi-disciplinary research team to help develop a new approach to long-haul travel ahead of its first Boeing 787 Dreamliner flights later this year.

The study will bring together researchers across fields such as nutrition, physical activity and sleep to map out strategies to counteract travel bugbears such as jet-lag.

It will look at issues such as onboard exercise and movement, menu design and service timing, pre- and post-flight preparation and transit lounge “wellness”.

An examination of the cabin environment will also look at how factors such as lighting and temperature affect passengers.

Qantas will be operating non-stop flights between Perth and London from March next year and between Melbourne and Los Angeles from December 15.

Read: Qantas puts its Perth-London non-stop on sale.

Using the B787 for these routes already puts it on the front foot because of the airliner’s bigger windows, lower cabin altitude, increased humidity and sophisticated lighting system.

Qantas boss Alan Joyce said the partnership aimed to develop innovations and strategies to complement the Dreamliner’s advantages.

“By taking a holistic view of our customers, our partnership will examine everything from reducing the impact of jetlag through to health, nutrition and sleep through the entire journey experience,” Joyce said in a statement.

“We’re all looking at how we can prepare passengers ahead of their long haul flight, and of course on board and when they arrive at their destinations; we want our customers to feel their best at the end of their flight with us.”

“The centre’s research has already influenced what meals and beverages we’ll be serving onboard and when, cabin lighting and temperature as well as the airport lounge experience.

“Neil Perry is working with the centre on new menus for the 787 flights so we are excited that one of Australia’s best culinary minds is teaming up with the best scientific minds to design the best possible menu to look after both health and hunger.”

Charles Perkins Centre academic director Steve Simpson said the “hugely exciting” partnership was the first time there had been an integrated multidisciplinary collaboration between an airline and a university around in-flight health and well-being beyond a medical emergency.

Professor Simpson said there was a potential for “extraordinary health, science and engineering discoveries and innovations” to come out of the partnership that could benefit airlines worldwide.

He said the project would explore what long-haul travel did to the body-clocks of passengers and how airline service delivery could be changed to help passengers ease into the destination time zone. Qantas could also use it to improve the health and wellness of its crews.

The multi-disciplinary team had already looked at the available evidence on possible strategies to phase-shift body clocks.

“We, for example, have worked with Qantas and Boeing on the wavelengths and intensity and timing of light,’’ he told AirlineRatings.

“This is obviously focusing initially on the Dreamliner Perth-to-London leg and what we’ve been able to do initially is provide advice which has now translated into the engineering of the aircraft about when the lights should come on and what the pattern of lighting, wavelength and intensity and timing should look like.

“We’re also coupling that with advice around temperature in the cabin and the types of foods that should be delivered.’’

The work with chef Neil Perry looks at foods that stimulate the production of melatonin, a natural hormone produced in the brain and linked to sleep and the body clock.

“We know there are certain amino acids that are precursors to its production and its synthesis in the brain and there is some evidence that foods that are rich in those precursor amino acids will be helpful in raising the levels of melatonin,’’  Prof. Simpson said.

“And also the timing of release — if you know how long after you’ve eaten that you start to see these changes then you can start advising people when might be a good time to think about eating and going to sleep.’’

Other issues under the microscope include beverages, hydration, physical activity and at what point in the flight passengers should try to sleep.

A second phase of the study involves evaluating the changes by recruiting passengers to don the wearable devices and collect basic information about biorthythms, sleep and environmental conditions while they are travelling.

“That’s just to see what they’re actually doing and whether it’s working,’’ Prof. Simpson said, noting the results would be interesting to the scientific community as well as airlines.

 

 

THE RATINGS YOU NEED!

AIRLINE SAFETY RATINGS
The only place in the world to get ALL Airline Safety Ratings in one place! The ONLY airline rating that includes Safety, Product and COVID-19 safety ratings! Visit our Ratings Now!

2024 Airline Excellence Awards

View our special section announcing the 2024 Airline Excellence Awards!

AIRLINERATINGS NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to have AirlineRatings.com Newsletter delivered to your inbox!

STAY CONNECTED

61,936FansLike
2,336FollowersFollow
4,714FollowersFollow
681FollowersFollow
Cookie settings