Book Flights
 

United orders 50 A321XLRs for trans-Atlantic expansion

Airbus
Image: Airbus

United Airlines says its new fleet of Airbus A321XLR aircraft will open up potential new destinations as it uses the long-range jets to replace older aircraft and expand its trans-Atlantic operations.

The US carrier announced Tuesday that it had signed a firm order with Airbus for 50 A321XLRs, at a list price of about $US7 billion, to replace its aging Boeing 757s.

It expects to use the aircraft for expanded services on trans-Atlantic routes from its key U.S. hubs in Newark/New York and Washington D.C.

The first A321XLR is due to be delivered to United in 2024 and the jets are expected to enter international service the following year.

READ: Airlines need to get priority boarding right

“The new Airbus A321XLR aircraft is an ideal one-for-one replacement for the older, less-efficient aircraft currently operating between some of the most vital cities in our intercontinental network,” said United chief commercial officer Andrew Nocella in the announcement. 

“In addition to strengthening our ability to fly more efficiently, the A321XLR opens potential new destinations to further develop our route network and provide customers with more options to travel the globe.”

The A321XLR has proved a popular choice with airlines looking for additional flexibility from a fuel-efficient narrowbody jet.

Its increased payload and range means they can provide economically viable service on longer routes that were not feasible with widebody jets.

Airbus notes it will allow service from the US  East Coast to a much larger selection of European destinations.

The A321XLR delivers a range of up to 4,700nm, with 30 percent lower fuel consumption per seat compared with previous-generation competitor jets.

It will have a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 101 metric tonnes, while takeoff, climb, and flight performance will change little from the A321neo and there is more than 90 percent commonality across the neo family.

It achieves its long-legged performance by combining the A321neo’s two rear center fuel tanks into one to add fuel capacity and reduce structural weight.

Other significant changes include structural reinforcements and modified landing gears for the increased MTOW, increased braking capability, higher tire speed, and additional flap and slat configurations.

The order comes as Boeing is still grappling with the crisis affecting its 737 MAX aircraft but this did not stop it from last month quietly rolling out the biggest member of the MAX family, the MAX 10.

Read: Boeing rolls out the MAX 10

The  MAX 10 can seat up to 230 passengers and Boeing says it offers the lowest seat-mile cost of any single-aisle airplane ever produced.

The Boeing jet will now undergo system checks and engine runs prior to a first flight next year.

Storms and communications problems brought jets too close

Virgin Australia

Two Boeing 737 jets hurtling towards each other on the same flight path came too close after civilian and military air traffic controllers struggled to co-ordinate a last-minute change due to weather.

The October, 2018, incident saw a Qantas 737 inbound to Brisbane from Melbourne on a reciprocal track to an outbound Virgin flight headed to the Queensland leisure destination of Proserpine.

The jets breached separation standards when they came within 2.1 nautical miles of each other horizontally and 650ft vertically.

READ: Save the planet – eat your Air New Zealand coffee cup

The minimum lateral separation allowed is three nautical miles and aircraft are supposed to maintain a vertical separation of 1000ft.

An investigation by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau found a combination of factors led to the breach, including thunderstorms and a global parachuting championship that prompted  Airservices Australia to reconfigure its Brisbane control center.

The Qantas aircraft was descending through military-controlled airspace near Amberley Air Force Base while the departing Virgin 737 was being managed by the civilian controllers at the Airservices Brisbane terminal control unit.

Planes
A map of the incidents shows the jets on the same flight path. Source: ATSB

Controllers in the two systems are currently required to share information manually while a joint system is under development.

The thunderstorms meant the Virgin plane was flying radar headings assigned by Brisbane air traffic control rather than using a standard instrument departure.

The Brisbane departures controller identified the Virgin plane as it approached Amberley airspace and was told by the military controller of the inbound Qantas jet.

Brisbane replied that the Virgin aircraft would soon be turning right, and this meant it would avoid Amberley airspace

However, when advised to turn right, the crew of the Virgin aircraft asked to continue on their current heading for another 70 or 80 nautical miles due to the weather.

This led to the Virgin jet entering Amberley airspace without a hand-off from Brisbane and operating on a different radio frequency to the military controller and the Qantas 737.

Compounding the problem was the fact that Airservices had not advised Amberley it had changed the terminal control unit configuration as a result of the parachuting event being put on hold.

This caused a 17-second delay in Amberley ATC being able to contact the correct controller during which time the distance between the planes reduced by 6kms.

“This delay in communication between Amberley and Brisbane ATC reduced the amount of time available to recover the impending loss of separation while the aircraft were closing on reciprocal tracks in opposite directions,” the report said.

“If this configuration change was immediately relayed to Amberley ATC, it would have allowed the Amberley approach controller more time to resolve the impending conflict between the two aircraft, and separation requirements may have been maintained.”

Once communication was established, the Virgin aircraft was transferred to the Amberley frequency and the two aircraft were diverted away from each other.

Investigators noted both aircraft were fitted with traffic collision avoidance systems that would have allowed pilots to resolve the conflict had ATC not done so.

The incident resulted in both Brisbane and Amberley ATC taking steps to improve communication between their two systems.

“This investigation highlights the importance of clear communication and coordination between air traffic controllers operating in different, yet immediately adjacent airspace, and the need for a clear understanding of the responsibility for separation assurance, especially when operating without a shared traffic picture,” ATSB director transport safety Dr Stuart Godley said.

“The ATSB welcomes the new dedicated communications pathway between the Amberley approach and Brisbane departures south positions, and the implementation of an airspace release that controls the risk that short notice deviations present across the two non-linked systems.”

Dr Godley said the successful recovery of separation also illustrated the effectiveness of the conflict resolution training received by air traffic controllers in loss of separation events.

Airlines need to get priority boarding right

Priority
Photo: John Walton

With the news that Qantas is revamping its priority boarding to give premium customers greater priority, it’s perhaps a useful time to think more widely about how to make this option a real perk for premium cabin passengers and highly valuable frequent flyers.

This is particularly the case as airlines continue to segment their cabins with extra-legroom economy, premium economy and basic economy options that all come with their own set of benefits.

It’s a fact of life that many passengers still like to board early, even regular travellers who one might imagine would have little to no desire to sit on a plane for any amount of time more than they need to.

READ our list of best airlines for 2020

Whether that’s to secure space in the overhead bin closest to them, to enjoy a pre-departure beverage, to ensure their jackets are hung up neatly, to get a bit of work done before pushback or simply to relax before takeoff, priority boarding is a benefit of either buying a more expensive ticket or for loyalty to an airline — and people buying the more expensive tickets and more loyal customers like (and frankly deserve) to get what they pay for.

The fundamental problem set is that there are usually only two queues, that there are now too many passengers in the “priority” queue — and that not all of those passengers are equally valuable to the airline.

Priotity boarding airlines
If everyone is priority, nobody is priority. Photo: John Walton

When you have a passenger in business class standing next to a high-tier frequent flyer who spends many tens of thousands of dollars with an airline every year, that’s one thing.

But when it’s business class, plus premium economy, plus extra-legroom economy, plus anyone more than just an entry-level of the frequent flyer program, all lumped in together in the “priority” zone, that’s a problem.

It’s often particularly problematic at outstation airports, whose contracted staff are not employed directly by the airline, are often poorly managed, and aren’t incentivized in any way to deliver a positive passenger experience for premium passengers.

But how to fix this problem? Lots of airlines have tried, whether that’s the US carriers with the relatively inelegant multiple tensabarrier corrals of boarding gates, the Japanese carriers with the boarding gates featuring staffers walking around holding laminated sheets confirming which group is boarding, or other options entirely.

For a start, airlines need to figure out how much space they have to play with. This may well vary based on the airport: at their home hub, they are likely to have more control over the overall experience, more staff who can assist, and a closer relationship with the airport.

The Emirates premium experience at Dubai, for example, is excellent but of course unique to the bi-level boarding process.

Airlines need to figure out how many different groups they need.

At a minimum, I think this is probably at least one for each class of service, with associated frequent flyer levels: platinum members board with first class, gold with business, silver with premium economy, and bronze with extra-legroom economy, for example.

I keep coming back to the necessity of policing — or at the very least signposting — the end of the queue as well.

Too often it’s too easy for passengers without priority boarding to simply join a queue to which they’re not entitled, shrug when they get to the end and end up being boarded anyway because it’s too much of a hassle to send them to the back of the line.

I’m struck that, with automatic boarding gates, this should not be an insurmountable problem — if the gates are located in the right place.

priority
Are automated boarding gates being placed in the right spot? Photo: SITA

Rather than having them at the end of the boarding queue, they should be in the beginning, allowing passengers to verify their eligibility for the queue and then entering into a segregated second queue.

This is, in essence, how easyJet works its Speedy Boarding process, and it is very effective.

Combined with this option could be the A/B queuing model: passengers for boarding group 1 line up in row A, and group 2 in row B. Group 3 enters row A after group 1 has completed boarding, and so on down the list.

A fundamental rethink likely requires a more thoughtful design of airports: something like, for example, what Singapore Changi does with gate-based security, except with boarding zones.

But there is much that airlines can think about in the meantime — and thinking is indeed needed.

 

Save the planet — eat your Air New Zealand coffee cup

Air NZ
Photo: Air New Zealand

Air New Zealand will allow people to have their coffee cups and eat them too in an innovative concept for reducing landfill.

The airline has begun trialing edible coffee cups in the air and on the ground as it looks for new ways to boost sustainability.

The airline currently serves more than eight million cups of coffee each year and introduced compostable coffee cups as a more environmentally-friendly alternative to old-style receptacles.

Read: Concern airlines could use loyalty data to discriminate on price

The plant-based compostable cups now on board all aircraft and in lounges are made from paper and corn, allowing them to be broken down in a commercial composter.

The airline estimates that switching to plant-based cups will prevent around 15 million cups from going to landfills annually.

But Air New Zealand senior manager customer experience Niki Chave said the ultimate goal would be to remove the cups totally from landfills.

And what better way than to get passengers to munch on them as a sort of dual-use biscuit?

Air New Zealand edible coffee cup

“We’ve been working in partnership with innovative New Zealand company ‘twiice’ to explore the future of edible coffee cups, which are vanilla flavored and leakproof,’’ Chave said.

“The cups have been a big hit with the customers who have used these and we’ve also been using the cups as dessert bowls.”

Chave said the airline will continue to trial twiice’s edible coffee cups and work with the company and other partners to explore scaling options that could make it a viable long-term product for the airline.

Twiice is a family company and makes the cup from wheat flour, sugar, egg and vanilla essence. The cups are handmade and the company recommends people eat the cup directly after finishing their hot drink.

Company co-founder Jamie Cashmore said the edible cups could play a big role in demonstrating to the world that new and innovative ways of packaging are achievable.

“It’s terrific that Air New Zealand has partnered with us to showcase to its customers and the world that a little bit of Kiwi ingenuity and innovation could have a really positive impact on the environment while at the same time delivering a really cool and tasty customer experience,”  he said.

AirNZ is also moving to reduce landfill by encouraging customers to bring their own reusable cups to use on board aircraft and in lounges.

 

 

Delta emergency slide falls on front garden

Slide delta garden
The slide from the Delta Boeing 767. Image: CNN

Residents of Milton Massachusetts could have been forgiven for thinking that online retailer Amazon had gone crazy with jumbo deliveries when a big inflatable slide fell from the skies on Sunday.

Yet it wasn’t a giant Amazon drone that had dropped its bundle on a local front garden but a Delta Air Lines flight traveling from Paris to Boston.

The emergency evacuation slide fell off the Boeing 767 accompanied by a loud noise as the aircraft was on approach to Boston Logan International Airport and about four nautical miles from the runway threshold.

READ our list of the best airlines for 2020.

The aircraft went on to land normally but not before it gave a resident tending his garden a rude shock.

Fortunately, no-one was injured.

Milton resident and surprised recipient of the slide Wenhan Huang told CNN he realized the slide was from an aircraft when he saw the words “Boeing” printed on it and quickly rang the police.

“It’s kind of crazy,” Huang told CNN affiliate WCVB. “Who could know there’s something coming from the air and drops into my yard, right? It’s pretty heavy. You can’t even carry it.”

The airline is investigating how and why the slide fell off but it has also re-ignited a political debate about the number of flights over Milton and nearby communities.

US Representative Stephen Lynch said he had asked for a briefing on the incident  from the Federal Aviation Administration and airport operator Mass Port.

“The escape slide did not inflate but instead came down in a compact bundle weighing about 100 pounds,’’ Lynch said.

“We are fortunate that no injuries or damage occurred.”

Lynch said he expected a report by the end of the week and added that the incident illustrated the vulnerability of towns beneath busy flight paths.

“We cannot expect the community of Milton and surrounding towns to live in fear of debris falling from the sky,’’ he said, adding he recently met FAA administrator Steve Dickson to discuss the number of flights “plaguing Milton and nearby communities with relentless airplane noise and pollution”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Australian investigators probe airliner ‘near collision’

Virgin

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau is investigating how a small aircraft from a flying school triggered a collision alert and prompted a regional airliner to abort its landing in what was described as a near collision.

A Virgin Australia ATR-72 turboprop aircraft was landing in the regional NSW town of Albury on October 19 when it came into conflict with a Piper Aircraft PA-28 operated by the Australian Airline Pilot Academy owned by rival carrier Regional Express.

READ: Concern airlines could use loyalty data to discriminate on price.

“Passing 1,300 ft on a straight-in approach to runway 25 at Albury Airport in visual meteorological conditions, the flight crew of the ATR 72 received a traffic collision avoidance system alert on the PA-28, which was turning final for runway 25,’’ the ATSB said in a website alert.

SEE some entertaining aviation ads from 30 years ago

“The flight crew of the ATR 72 conducted a missed approach to increase separation between the two aircraft.”

The ATSB did not say how close the aircraft came but labeled the incident as serious.

It plans to interview directly involved parties and look at other information such as recorded data.

The bureau is also investigating an engine pod strike involving a Singapore Airlines Cargo Boeing 747-412F freighter at Sydney Airport on November 28.

It said the no. 1 engine pod struck the ground during a missed approach procedure.

Reports will be released at the end of both investigations and the ATSB said it would immediately notify relevant stakeholders should a critical safety issue be identified during the investigations.

 

LATAM codeshare deals extend Delta’s South American reach

LATAM Delta South America
LATAM Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner photographed from Wolfe Air Aviation Learjet 25B. Photo: LATAM

Codeshare agreements signed this week by three LATAM Airlines Group affiliates with new partner Delta Air Lines aim to improve connectivity between the Americas.

The agreements were signed December 2 with LATAM affiliates in Peru, Colombia and Ecuador and are due to start in the first quarter of 2020, subject to regulatory approval.

They come in the wake of Delta’s $US1.9 billion deal to take a 20 percent stake in the South American group as part of the US carrier’s global strategy of expanding internationally through joint ventures and minority stakes in other carriers.

The deal leverages the carriers’ complementary route networks and strengthens existing interline agreements with the addition of perks such as reciprocal lounge access and mutual frequent flyer benefits.

The three codeshare agreements inked December 2 will offer LATAM customers the option of connecting to as many as 74 onward destinations in the United States and Canada.

READ: Concern airlines could use loyalty data to discriminate on pricing.

It will open as many as 51 onward destinations in South America for Delta passengers.

“These codeshares mark an important milestone in LATAM’s journey towards offering the best connectivity and customer experience in the Americas,”’ LATAM Group chief executive Enrique Ceto said in the codeshare announcement.

“Our passengers will soon be able to access up to 74 destinations in the United States and Canada, which is just one example of complementary nature of our networks and one of the many future benefits that the strategic agreement with Delta will bring.”

The partners anticipate that from the first quarter of next year LATAM Airlines Peru’s “LA” code will be added to Delta flights from New York/JFK, Miami, Los Angeles and Orlando to up to 74 onward destinations in the United States and Canada.

Delta’s  “DL” code will be added to LATAM Airlines Peru flights between Lima and up to 34 onward destinations in Peru and South America.

Delta’s code will be added to LATAM Airlines Colombia flights from Bogota and Cartagena to up to 13 onward destinations in Colombia.

LATAM Airlines Ecuador’s code, also “LA”,  will be added to Delta flights between New York/JFK and up to 55 onward destinations in the US and Canada.

Similarly, Delta’s code will be added to LATAM Airlines Ecuador flights between Quito and up to four onward destinations in Ecuador.

LATAM also plans to establish codeshare agreements between Delta and its affiliates in Chile and Brazil in 2020.

Why great airport architecture makes a difference

airport architecture
Image: Zaha Hadid Architects and Cox Architecture

With the frankly stunning plans from Zaha Hadid Architects and Cox Architecture
for the new Western Sydney International Airport, it’s perhaps time to take a look at how crucial architecture is to designing an airport that becomes a pleasure rather than a burden to use.

In style, the terminal is somewhat reminiscent of the latest plans for Amsterdam
Schiphol, going for a modernist feel in the vein of iconic villas from Le Corbusier or
Niemeyer.

READ our list of best airlines for 2020

That’s sort of a polite way of saying that, from the outside, it looks like a glass
box with an overhanging flat lid on top, despite the glitzy rendering from Hadid &
Cox that suggests that the wavy wooden roofing structure underneath harkens
back to the Blue Mountains.

But this glass box is actually a remarkably sensible way to build an airport terminal.

Space and flexibility are crucial, as the creaking interiors of many of Australia’s
existing airports show.

Realigning the old model of ranks upon ranks of check-in desks to move to the new model of kiosk plus bag drop is fundamentally complex when there are internal walls involved.

The same is true when a new security modality manifests itself and requires more scanning space.

Here, the kiosk plus bag drop model is designed in, with just a few narrow pillars
breaking up the space, which one assumes will, in fact, be surrounded by the
kiosks rather than standing separately in the middle of check-in.

In the bigger picture, the airport terminal as conceived forms a large, squared-off
U, with gates extending to create a total structure shaped like an elongated H.

airport architecture
Image: Zaha Hadid Architects and Cox Architecture

This first phase of four, however, is just one of the top sides of the U alongside one
of the two runways.

The eventual H-shape, however, will be massive, seeming to spread nearly the
entire length of the runways (planned for 3700m).

One has to hope that the designers are including eventual plans for some sort of intra-terminal transportation for connecting passengers because a three-kilometre hike between flights is not for everyone.

But the wow factor is there.

Think about the airports people love to use: Singapore Changi. Seoul Incheon. Doha Hamad. And then think about the ones that are… well, let’s say less beloved. Frankfurt. London Heathrow. Pretty much any major airport in the United States.

It’s not just about signature pieces like Changi’s massive indoor Jewel gardens
or Doha’s terrifying #LampBear artwork.

Yes, it’s about creating a space that looks and feels wonderful — but it also has to be easy to get around.

While London Heathrow’s 2008-era Terminal 5, home to British Airways and its
IAG stablemate Iberia, has some airy wow factor when walking into the top check-in
level, that’s only from the car arrivals.

Trains arrive in the sub-basement and it’s then a trek upstairs, and once you’re through security it’s what feels like a purposefully confusing maze of shops, including a mandatory walk back and forth through the terminal to make sure you’ve seen them all before you’re allowed to go downstairs to the gates and/or the strangely infrequent shuttle to the remote satellites.

Similarly, Lufthansa’s creaking Frankfurt base reflects the ongoing hostile relationship
between the airport authority and its key airline tenant, with three long and distant pier spokes emanating by an ugly and unpleasant central hub space without
adequate inter-pier transit and often without moving walkways, despite a risibly
low 45-minute minimum connection time. (I must note that in all my years of travel I
have had bags delayed precisely three times, two of which were connecting via
Frankfurt.).

By and large, people don’t mind walking through a well-designed space, although
adequate provisions must clearly be made for passengers with reduced
mobility, including older travelers.

At the end of the day, ensuring quick, easy connections in addition to a pleasant arrival and departure experience is the fundamental holy grail of terminal design.

Concern airlines could use loyalty data to discriminate on price

airlines
Photo: Wikicommons

Australia’s competition watchdog has raised concerns that airlines could use frequent flyer data to target individual customers and charge them inflated prices.

The potential for customer profiling and the misuse of the vast amounts of data collected by loyalty schemes has prompted the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to call for improvements to loyalty schemes generally as well as legislative reforms.

The ACCC’s final report into customer loyalty schemes calls on program operators such as airlines, supermarkets and hotels to better inform customers about the use of their data.

It wants them to improve their data practices and to stop automatically linking members’ payment cards to their loyalty profiles.

READ our list of the best airlines for 2020.

It also calls for broader changes in consumer and privacy laws to prohibit unfair contract terms and trading practices.

“We are calling on companies that offer loyalty schemes to improve both their data practices and how they communicate with consumers, to help consumers understand how these programs operate,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

“Even simple changes, such as more prominently alerting customers that their points are about to expire, for example, in the subject line of an email, could help prevent a consumer from losing points earned over several years.”

The ACCC is worried that the sharing with third parties of customer data is leading to an increase in unsolicited and annoying targeted advertising.

It also warned it could result in different consumers being offered different prices for an identical product or service.

The potential for this kind of individual pricing was raised in 2015  at an International Air Transport Association conference where it was suggested airlines could charge more for people who lived in wealthier suburbs.

There were reports at the time of travel companies like Obitz and American Airlines posting higher prices for customers using Apple’s Safari web browser on the assumption they might be wealthier than Microsoft users.

“Many consumers are increasingly concerned about receiving targeted advertising, in some cases from companies that they have never dealt with before,” Sims said.

“There is also an emerging risk of real consumer harm if individual consumers were to be charged inflated prices based on profiling derived from their data.

“For example, if a person’s frequent flyer data or online search history indicates they can only travel on certain dates, or otherwise based on their income, geographic location or other information collected through the loyalty scheme they may be charged extra.”

Other concerns raised by the ACCC included vague loyalty scheme privacy policies and the broad consents they seek about how they will collect, use and disclose customer data.

The watchdog pointed to supermarket schemes that continued to collect customer data at the checkout even if they do not present their loyalty cards.

“They do this by tracking customers’ credit or debit cards from previous transactions,” Sims said.

“When a customer chooses not to present their loyalty card, we think it is reasonable that they would not expect their data to be collected for that transaction, and we are therefore calling on the relevant schemes to stop this practice.”

A spokeswoman for Virgin Australia, which boasts 10 million members and 300 brands under its Velocity loyalty scheme, said the airline did not price dynamically based on personal characteristics.

The spokeswoman said airfare pricing on any given route was driven by a combination of factors, including demand, how close the date of booking is to the date of travel, seasonality, operating costs and third party costs such as airport pricing and taxes.

She said the company regularly reviewed its policies to ensure members were clearly informed about the Velocity program, including data policies.

“Velocity is always looking at ways to improve and has taken on-board many of the ACCC’s observations to enhance our member terms and conditions and privacy policy,” she said.

Qantas, which has about 13 million members, also promised improvements for its frequent flyers.

It said people chose to join its loyalty program because they could see benefits and value,  such as the five million reward flights taken last year

“There’s a lot about our frequent flyer program that our members tell us they love but there are also areas of the program that have increasingly come under pressure as a result of rapid expansion which is why we made significant changes to the program earlier this year like slashing carrier charges, making a million more reward seats available and making it easier to find seats on our website,” the airline said in a statement.

Weekly Roundup – December 2nd, 2019

Ai rNew Zealand trans-Tasman

Here are our 4 most popular articles from the past week.


investigators call for clearer instructions after AirAsia chaos

AirAsia indonesia ATSB
A passenger on the AirAsia Indonesia flight. Photo: Seven News

Cabin crew shouting inappropriate instructions such as “brace” and “crash position” contributed to passenger confusion and panic during a cabin pressurization problem on an AirAsia Indonesia flight from Perth to Bali, according to Australian investigators.

READ ARTICLE


Best Airlines 2020: Airline Ratings Names Air New Zealand Top Carrier

best airlines 2020

The world’s best airlines for 2020 have been named by AirlineRatings.com, the world’s only safety and product rating website, and the airline of the year is Air New Zealand.

READ ARTICLE


 Airbus boss does not regret A380 decision

airbus A380
Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury. Photo: Steve Creedy

The order by Emirates for 50 Airbus A350s at the recent Dubai Air Show was a last-minute affair, so much so that there wasn’t even time to print press releases in time for the announcement press conference.

READ ARTICLE


Unruly passengers face overseas jail under new rules

Unruly passenger laws
Image: EASA

Passengers who act badly on a plane after January 1 might find themselves cooling their heels in an unpleasant jail in a country they never expected to visit.

A new protocol due to come into force from January 1, 2020, makes it easier for police in the country in which a plane lands to prosecute unruly passengers.

READ ARTICLE


THE RATINGS YOU NEED!

AIRLINE SAFETY RATINGS
The only place in the world to get ALL Airline Safety Ratings in one place! The ONLY airline rating that includes Safety, Product and COVID-19 safety ratings! Visit our Ratings Now!

2024 Airline Excellence Awards

View our special section announcing the 2024 Airline Excellence Awards!

AIRLINERATINGS NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to have AirlineRatings.com Newsletter delivered to your inbox!

STAY CONNECTED

61,936FansLike
2,336FollowersFollow
4,714FollowersFollow
681FollowersFollow
Cookie settings